Home > News > UK Developers Told They Must Foot Bill for Unsafe Cladding
A man looks at tributes placed near Grenfell Tower in London, Sunday, June 14, 2020. Britain is marking the third anniversary of the Grenfell Tower fire with a virtual church service to remember the 72 people who died in the blaze. Sunday marks three years since a small kitchen fire in the west London public-housing block turned into the worst domestic blaze in the country since World War II. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

UK Developers Told They Must Foot Bill for Unsafe Cladding

The risk posed by some kinds of aluminum composite cladding was exposed when fire engulfed London high-rise Grenfell Tower in June 2017, killing 72 people in Britain’s deadliest domestic blaze since World War II.

Investigators found that the building’s flammable cladding helped the fire, which started in an apartment kitchen, race out of control.

Safety regulations brought in since then require similar dangerous cladding to be removed, but the work hasn’t been carried out on some apartment buildings because of wrangling over who should pay.

While high-rise buildings have been able to get government funding to remove the cladding, low-rise dwellings haven’t.

Housing and Communities Secretary Michael Gove said that by the end of March developers must come up with a plan to pay the estimated 4 billion-pound ($5.4 billion) cost of fixing the cladding on buildings between 11 meters and 18 meters (36 feet and 59 feet) in height, or face legal action and potentially a new tax to raise the money.

Gove said developers and cladding companies should pay to make buildings safe, not apartment owners who were “being asked to pay with money they didn’t have for a problem that they did not cause.”

He told lawmakers in the House of Commons that “we will make industry pay to fix all of the remaining problems.”

“We will give them the chance to do the right thing,” Gove said. “I hope that they will take it, but I can confirm to the House today that if they do not then, if necessary, we will impose a solution upon them in law.”

Reece Lipman, who lives in a London building with flammable cladding, welcomed the government’s “firmer tone,” but said the proposals didn’t go far enough.

“It feels like the government (keeps) trying to bail water off the Titanic with pots and pans and that’s great, some people will be saved, but the ship is still going down and we haven’t yet addressed that problem,” he said.

Leave a Reply


Check Also

Video: Why Firefighter Air Replenishment Systems? The Firefighter Air Coalition Explains

Watch this short video to see why firefighter air replenishment systems (FARS) ...

Fire Chief: London Fire Brigade Part of ‘Institutional Failure’ in Grenfell Tragedy

Commissioner of the London Fire Brigade Andy Roe had some criticism for ...

South Carolina Considers High-Rise Safety Study

In the wake of the collapse of the Surfside condominiums in Florida, ...

Did 2002 Materials Tests Predict Grenfell Tower Disaster?

Activists are urging British officials to make a full disclosure of the ...

Update: Six Tom Brennan Lifetime Award Winners Speak About Firefighter Air Replenishment Systems

As More Cities Adopt Appendix L, It Seems the Fire Service is ...

Quincy (MA) Councilors Ask for High-Rise Firefighting Plan, Money for Legal Counsel

City councilors in Quincy are asking fire department officials to come before ...